-
The appearance of “HoloStan,” an AI-powered hologram of the late Marvel legend Stan Lee, at LA Comic Con sparked a controversy that highlights the evolving legal and ethical boundaries of posthumous intellectual property commercialization. Despite Lee's passing in 2018, fans were offered three-minute interactions with the digital recreation. This initiative is part of a broader strategy by Kartoon Studios (formerly Genius Brands) and Stan Lee’s POW! Entertainment to aggressively commercialize the "Stan Lee Universe," which includes worldwide rights to his name, likeness, and over 100 non-Disney creations. The commercial success of this strategy, including new films and licensing, stands in contrast to the strong online backlash calling the exploitation "ghoulish."
-
The controversy surrounding HoloStan raises broader questions about the ownership, commercialization, and ethical use of a deceased person’s likeness and intellectual property. Fans and commentators questioned whether such digital recreations respect the legacy of the deceased and whether commercial exploitation crosses ethical boundaries. There is also a legal dimension: the limitations of copyright in regulating AI-generated likenesses, deepfakes, and digital impersonations, particularly when the deceased person’s estate or moral rights may be sidelined in favour of commercial ventures.
-
In response to the challenges posed by AI-generated content, various European legislatures are proposing reforms to strengthen posthumous rights. Denmark is exploring amendments to its copyright law to grant rights over digital imitations for 50 years after an individual’s death, while preserving exceptions for artistic freedom like satire. Similarly, the Netherlands is considering changes to the Neighbouring Rights Act, aiming to grant performers non-transferable exclusive rights over AI-generated reproductions of their performances for 70 years post-mortem. While commentators caution against overburdening copyright, these legislative steps offer a crucial path to controlling unauthorized digital likenesses and safeguarding personal legacy rights in the age of AI.
-
The HoloStan case illustrates the tension between commercialization and ethical stewardship of a deceased creator’s legacy. Kartoon Studios’ aggressive exploitation of Stan Lee’s IP, while legally sanctioned, has drawn criticism for appearing “ghoulish” or ghostly, highlighting the limitations of current copyright frameworks in addressing posthumous AI impersonations. Legislative initiatives in Denmark and the Netherlands show a growing recognition of these challenges, offering a potential path to protect performers’ rights and personal likenesses. As AI-generated content continues to proliferate, balancing commercial interests with moral and ethical considerations will be critical, reminding us that, as with all power, the ability to replicate and profit from a person’s image comes with great responsibility.